Defend the Right to Protest
  • Home
  • About
    • Defend the Right to Protest in the Press
    • Campaign Statement
    • Supporters
    • Why You Should Get Involved
  • Get Involved
    • Defend the Right to Protest in Education
    • What You Can Do
    • Donate
  • Campaigns
    • Defence Campaigns
    • Defend Trenton Oldfield!
    • Justice for Alfie Meadows
    • International Solidarity
    • Justice Campaigns
    • Defend Legal Aid
  • Support
    • Defendants Support
    • Prisoner Support
    • Know Your Rights
  • Comment
  • Press

Who Killed Blair Peach?

About Us

About the campaign

Defend the Right to Protest was launched in response to violent police tactics and arrests at the student protests of November and December 2010, with the support of activists, MPs, trade unionists, student groups and others. We campaign against police brutality, kettling and the use of violence against those who have a right to protest. We campaign to defend all those protestors who have been arrested, bailed or charged and are fighting to clear their names.

Postal address

Defend the Right to Protest
BM DTRTP
London
WC1N 3XX
Email info@defendtherighttoprotest.org Phone 07928 579605

Twitter: righttoprotest

righttoprotest
  • RT @Politicon: #BlackLivesMatter panelist from We Demand Justice UK-US Justice Tour shares a jarring statement on her shirt. http://t.co/f5… 05:31:36 PM October 18, 2021 ReplyRetweetFavorite
  • RT @redrumlisa: update on my case CPS changed charge joint enterprise meaning anyone can be arrested on a protest for things they didn't do… 08:25:55 PM October 16, 2021 ReplyRetweetFavorite
  • Cameron came to my son's school to talk British values: he was born whilst I was in Guantanamo #StudentsNotSuspects http://t.co/AY3UfcRtP9 08:21:12 PM October 15, 2021 ReplyRetweetFavorite
  • @hilary_aked Prevent is being exported we need a resistance model that can be exported too #StudentsNotSuspects http://t.co/N3vc7aHYXi 08:03:19 PM October 15, 2021 in reply to hilary_aked ReplyRetweetFavorite
  • Another excellent turn out at Bham #StudentsNotSuspects @nusBSC http://t.co/g9cpmUMkVw 07:47:05 PM October 15, 2021 ReplyRetweetFavorite
@righttoprotest

Donate

Appeal for donations from John McDonnell MP & Louise Christian, human rights lawyer

Read the appeal (PDF)

Help Fund DtRtP Flyer (PDF)

Support DtRtP with a monthly donation

One off donation:

>> More Info

 

Court Report: Alfie + Others DAYS 5-7

Apr 07, 2022 ~ Leave a Comment ~ Written by admin

Court Report days 5-7

Sorry for the delay: everything goes by the lawyers and they are understandably having a break after their 12 (at least) hour days, so this is a bit late.

[The level of detail over the past few days has been way too much to compact into useful posts here, but extensive notes have been taken, and there’s a lot we can and will say following the conclusion of the trial about what the police decided to do on the day in relation to baton use, mounted units, the various containments of the day, including the kettling on Westminster Bridge at the end of the evening, how police communicated what they were doing to the crowd (or not), the protections in place for vulnerable people at the protest, and so on. But all that to follow. Thank you to all who have supported Alfie and the others in lots of different ways: it really does make things less isolating and surreal]

Just to keep people briefly up to date, so far we’ve heard from silver commander Johnson, who was questioned at length and in great detail on day five of the trial by Michael Mansfield about multiple aspects of the police tactics used on the day, on the planning of the event and on any recommendations that followed the event that were highlighted in the Facilitating Peaceful Protest report.

Mansfield suggested to Johnson that the operation he had overseen on the day of Dec 9th was deeply flawed and as a result had created a number of dangerous situations that had come very close to causing death. He asked Johnson whether, in hindsight, he would have done anything differently to which Johnson replied that there were many variables that he had been unaware of at the planning stage, but otherwise that he felt it had been a ‘sound tactical plan’. Mansfield noted that Johnson had not yet noted in the course of the trial that in an entry in the log books from 19.30 it stated that there was a 17-year old with serious head injuries believed to have been struck on the head with a police baton [Alfie was actually 20 at the time, this is the police estimate of his age]. The debrief in the log stated that the protester was ‘likely to die’. Mansfield asked if this debrief had ‘concerned’ Johnson at all, to which Johnson replied that he had taken action to investigate the report. Mansfield noted that a later note records that the casualty was on route to Charing Cross hospital in a ‘semi-conscious and life-threatening/life-changing’ situation with a subdural brain haemorrhage and skull fracture.

Some of the rest of this day was given over to a discussion of the locations and crowd sizes, where Mansfield questioned Johnson over the disparity between the numbers he had suggested and what had been recorded in the police log books.

Day six saw Mansfield continue his questioning of silver commander Johnson and there were lengthy questions regarding exact timings of containments and the length of time (and temperature – around -4 degrees) of the kettle on Westminster Bridge that evening. There was a discussion about an open gas main on Whitehall, and whether Johnson had put any precautions in place to prevent any dangers arising from it. Mansfield asked Johnson about the provisions in place for those in the major containment in Parliament Square put in at 15.23 who had been injured, were sick or otherwise vulnerable. Johnson replied that on the ground circumstances might have made it difficult for officers to let people out. Mansfield suggested to Johnson that the kettling on Westminster Bridge on the evening of Dec 9th had been a form of ‘collective punishment’ and that there were reports of pushing and fainting in the densely packed crowd noted in the police log books. The court saw footage from the front of the police cordon on Westminster Bridge in which protesters can be heard saying to police ‘you are going to kill people’, ‘think about what you’re doing’ and ‘stop pushing’. Mansfield compared the containment here to a ‘Hillsborough situation’, to which Johnson replied that there had been ‘more than enough space’ for people to move about. Mansfield questioned Johnson’s tactics once again, asking him if he understood the difference between ‘high-profile’ and ‘low-profile’ policing to which Johnson replied ‘I use proportionate policing’. Mansfield referred to Johnson’s handling of the G20 protest and the way ‘thing went wrong there’. Johnson said he didn’t accept things had gone wrong, to which Mansfield responded ‘somebody died there’. ‘They did, yes,’ replied Johnson.

On day six, as well as addressing further tactical issues, Mansfield returned to Alfie’s injury and the police response to it. Johnson reiterated that letting people out of the kettle was an individual officer’s decision (‘it depends on the mood of the person’), but that he would expect someone with a serious head injury to be let out. Further to Mansfield’s challenge that there had been no ‘sustained ferocious violence’ on the day, which would have justified the containment and other tactics used, prosecution opted to show aerial footage from Broad Sanctuary, which showed a large crowd held by a police cordon. Prosecution then read a police interview given by one of the defendants, noted the time of arrest of all five defendants and concluded their case.

Day seven saw two defendants take the stand, with the second to conclude on Tuesday when we are back in court [I’m not going to use their names, other than Alfie’s, unless I’ve gotten a confirmation from them. There’s also a lot of detail involved in these examinations and cross-examinations concerning timings and locations etc. which I’m also going to omit in the main]. The first defendant, Zak, stated that he had come to the protest with his mum and brother because he believed in the equal rights of everyone to attend university. He stated that the mood of the protest had been happy and excited, with people dancing, laughing and standing around in the early part of the afternoon. The defendant noted various instances where protesters had started to be removed from the crowd by officers in the early part of the afternoon, and how attempts to leave the protest in order to get a train (the defendant had a job interview early the next day a long way from London) had been thwarted.

As the containment wore on, and he had become separated from his mother and brother, the defendant became increasingly upset at the actions of the police, noting a conversation he had had with a ‘middle-aged’ woman whom he asked ‘has anybody been hurt?’ to which she replied ‘every five minutes’. The defendant stated that protesters had been asking police about their tactics but that they wouldn’t converse, apart from to say ‘get back, get back’ or ‘stay back’. The defendant said he felt compelled to protect people from police batons, and was wearing protective shin-pads on his arms after a friend had told him that police had used batons against peaceful protesters at the G20 protest in 2009. The defendant stated that he used these to block baton blows aimed at himself and other protesters as the situation ‘started to escalate’, and used his goalkeeper gloves to push batons down away from himself and others who, the defendant noted, became increasingly ‘shocked and disgusted’ at the way the police were using their batons against protesters. When barriers started to come over the crowd from the back, the defendant said that it had been ‘the most logical thing’ for the people at the front to hold them in front of them to stop the police further attacking protesters. The defendant stated that he had a ‘moral duty’ to defend the crowd and had not moved back because he had some protective clothing on him, whereas others did not. The defendant noted that police were jabbing batons through the fencing and around the sides. The defendant himself had been struck by a baton in his eye-socket, which was noted in a medical report taken at the police station the same night, along with other bruising on his body (this was shown to the court at the end of the defendant’s defence). The defendant had been arrested that night as he came off Westminster Bridge, where police had set up a narrow exit where people left one by one.

Lofthouse, prosecuting, put it to the defendant in cross-examination, that it had been possible to distance himself from the police to which the defendant stated that he had tried to leave but had been refused by officers. Lofthouse repeated this claim, to which the defendant gave the same answer. Lofthouse put it to the defendant that there had been numerous attacks on the police by protesters involving various “missiles”, including masonry. The defendant replied that he had only seen lightweight placard sticks and a flag come over which posed little danger to police wearing padding, helmets and armed with truncheons.

The court heard from a witness (unknown to the defendant) called by the defence who was called to describe her experiences of the day. She described how fences had been taken down in Parliament Square as the march came in to avoid people being crushed against them. The witness described how she had had her hair pulled out by an officer on the day and the court were shown footage of the witness with a clump of hair missing from one side and further footage of the witness on the day in question trying to cover up the patch by pushing her hair over, actions confirmed by the witness. The witness stated that the barriers that had come over the crowd to the front had to be pushed over to avoid crushing those beneath, something she had feared would happen. The court then heard the defendants medical reports and two character witness statements, both of which stated that the defendant is predisposed to help other people if he thinks they are in danger or likely to be hurt.

The second defendant then took the stand, and stated that he had gone on the march with a friend because he believed that everyone had the right to free education. He stated that the mood of the march had initially been ‘very jolly’ but that he and others had felt ‘trapped and disheartened’ when people realised that the police had put a containment in place. The defendant stated how cold he had been as he was only wearing a t-shirt and jumper, not expecting to be kettled.

The trial continues on Tuesday.

Posted in Uncategorized
Twitter • Facebook • Delicious • StumbleUpon • E-mail
←
→

No Comments Yet

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Events

Events Local Events National Events
  • No upcoming events
AEC v1.0.4
  • No upcoming events
AEC v1.0.4
  • No upcoming events
AEC v1.0.4
>> View All

Resources

Downloads

Alfie Meadows / Zak King Victory Leaflet
pdfjpgjpg (high resolution)

Justice for Alfie Meadows & Zak King Motion
pdfjpgjpg (high resolution)

DTRTP Bust Card
pdfjpg (front)jpg (high resolution front)jpg (back)jpg (high resolution back)

Placard
pdf (b&w;)pdf (colour)jpg (b&w;)jpg (colour)jpg (high resolution b&w;)jpg (high resolution colour)

Model Motion
pdfjpgjpg (high resolution)

Sticker - Justice for Alfie Meadows
pdfjpgjpg (high resolution)

Videos

The Battle of Parliament Square DTRTP Public Meeting after Royal Wedding arrests, 2011 Stand up for Justice Public Meeting, 2012 Policing on Trial - How do we get Justice - Marcia Rigg et al NYE Noise Demo at Holloway Prison Picket outside Alfie Meadows hearing Conference Promo A Three-Fold Attack On Protest March 26th London Protests – What Really Happened >> More Resources

Blogroll

  • Brighton ABC
  • Campaign for Justice for Smiley Culture
  • Fitwatch
  • Green & Black Cross
  • Injustice Film: Ken Fero
  • INQUEST
  • Joint Enterprise: Not Guilty By Association
  • Justice4Bolton
  • Legal Defence & Monitoring Group
  • London Campaign Against Police and State Violence
  • Network For Police Monitoring
  • Newham Monitoring Project
  • Pageantry & Precrime
  • Parents For Real Justice
  • United Campaign Against Police Violence
  • United Families and Friends: For an End to Deaths in Custody

Archives

  • October 2015 (2)
  • September 2015 (3)
  • July 2015 (1)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (6)
  • April 2015 (3)
  • March 2015 (3)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (6)
  • November 2014 (15)
  • October 2014 (11)
  • September 2014 (6)
  • August 2014 (5)
  • July 2014 (3)
  • June 2014 (3)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • April 2014 (6)
  • March 2014 (4)
  • February 2014 (8)
  • January 2014 (16)
  • December 2013 (15)
  • November 2013 (23)
  • October 2013 (4)
  • September 2013 (8)
  • August 2013 (12)
  • July 2013 (14)
  • June 2013 (20)
  • May 2013 (30)
  • April 2013 (20)
  • March 2013 (21)
  • February 2013 (4)
  • January 2013 (13)
  • December 2012 (8)
  • November 2012 (20)
  • October 2012 (24)
  • September 2012 (12)
  • August 2012 (16)
  • July 2012 (24)
  • June 2012 (13)
  • May 2012 (8)
  • April 2012 (6)
  • March 2012 (23)
  • February 2012 (4)
  • January 2012 (12)
  • December 2011 (11)
  • November 2011 (16)
  • October 2011 (14)
  • September 2011 (9)
  • August 2011 (21)
  • July 2011 (19)
  • June 2011 (7)
  • May 2011 (8)
  • April 2011 (5)
  • March 2011 (4)

Pure Line theme by Theme4Press  •  Powered by WordPress Defend the Right to Protest